Teoriya i praktika fizicheskoy kultury №6 2017, pp.3-5

Dr.Hab., Professor L.I. Lubysheva¹
Dr.Hab., Professor S.V. Dmitriev^2
1Russian State University of Physical Education, Sports, Youth and Tourism (GTSOLIFK), Moscow
²Kozma Minin Nizhny Novgorod State Pedagogical University, Nizhny Novgorod

The article considers a variety of theoretical, practical and regulatory concepts of anthropic technology application in the national physical education system, with the objective-subjective field of competitive ontokinesiology developed by V.K. Bal'sevich, a prominent specialist in biomechanics and kinesiology commonly recognized the world over, being used as a study model. It was demonstrated that the educational research technologies giving a high priority to a creative research and personality developing education tools and supported by research-specific software are to help mobilize and activate the internal individual development and self-improvement mechanisms. A trainee determined to acquire professional competences of a sport educator-technologist and mastering in onto-didactics should be capable to contribute to the creative socio-cultural activity. We believe that the kinesiological approach implemented in the national physical education system will facilitate the efforts to build up a harmonic universe of humanitarian and natural-scientific knowledge due to the natural objective-subjective dualism in understanding of a physical education phenomenon typical for both of the scientific sectors being removed.

Keywords: ontodidactics, ontokinesiology, anthropic technologies, kinesiological approach, physical education.

References

1. Bal'sevich V.K. Ocherki po vozrastnoy kineziologii cheloveka [Essays on developmental kinesiology in man]. Moscow: Sovetskiy sport publ., 2009, 220 p.
2. Dmitriev S.V. Sotsiokulturnaya teoriya dvigatelnykh deystviy cheloveka [Socio-cultural theory of human motor actions]. N. Novgorod: NSPU publ., 2011, 359 p.
3. Dmitriev S.V., Byistritskaya E.V Antropno-deyatelnostnaya paradigma v pedagogike (Polemicheskie zametki) [Anthropic-Activity Paradigm In Pedagogics (Polemic Remarks)]. Teoriya i praktika fiz. kultury, 2013, no. 1, pp. 96-101.
4. Dmitriev S.V., Neverkovich S.D., Bystritskaya E.V. Obrazovatelnye tekhnologii – ot logiki vzaimodeystviya k logike sotvorchestva [Educational technologies - from logic of interaction to logic of co-creation]. Sportivny psikholog, 2011, no. 2 (23), pp. 72-77.
5. Korenberg V.B. Aktivnost – protosoznanie – deyatelnost – soznanie (obrashchenie k probleme obshchey teorii deyatelnosti) [Activity - proto-consciousness - activity - consciousness (addressing the problem of general theory of activity)]. Moscow: KDU publ., 2011, 216 p.
6. Lubysheva L.I., Zagrevskaya A.I. Kineziologicheskiy podkhod kak metodologiya sovremennoy sportivnoy nauki [Kinesiological approach as methodology of modern sports science and practice]. Teoriya i praktika fiz. kultury, 2015, no. 12, pp. 3-5.
7. Novichkov N.B. Ontodidaktika i obrazovatelnye standarty [Ontodidactics and educational standards]. Srednee professionalnoe obrazovanie, 2010, no. 8, pp. 2-5.