Teoriya i praktika fizicheskoy kultury №3 2017, pp.9-11

UDC 796.071

Dr.Hab., Professor V.I. Bondin¹
T.A. Putilina2
¹Southern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don
²Rostov State Transport University, Rostov-on-Don

The modern national physical education system gives an increasing priority to the revision of the traditional physical culture and sports sector specialist education models in the context of the modern social development policies set by the government regulatory documents geared to reform the education system so as to facilitate the social development, national security and growth of the people’s wellbeing. Objective of the study was to analyse the present situation and most promising ways to improve the quality of the physical culture and sports sector specialist education. The study data and analyses were used to outline the promising modern professional education models that need to be implemented albeit in practical terms are still far from coming into effect. We believe that the physical culture and sports sector specialist education quality may be improved by innovative approaches to the academic education process reforms with due emphasis on the modern multisided knowledge of human development accumulated in every field of science. Based on the study findings, we offer an innovative research field and the relevant academic Kinesioergonomics discipline designed to build up the relevant special competences and optimise the training process by customising it to a variety of environmental conditions.

Keywords: quality, training, specialists, physical culture, sports.

References

1. Bondin V.I., Putilina T.A., Manuylenko E.V., Arapu N.G. Kinezisenergonomicheskiy podkhod k ukrepleniyu zdorovya cheloveka [Kinesisenergonomic approach to human health strengthening]. Mater. vtoroy mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. "Obrazovanie, sport, zdorove v sovremennykh usloviyakh ekologicheskoy sredy" [Proc. 2nd Intern. res.-pract. conf. "Education, Sport and Health in modern conditions of the ecological environment"]. South Federal University. Rostov-on-Don, 2013, pp. 37-49.
2. Bondin V.I., Putilina T.A. Fizkulturno-ozdorovitelnoe samosovershenstvovanie studentov v sisteme professionalnoy podgotovki po fizicheskoy kulture i sportu na osnove kinezisenergonomicheskogo podkhoda [Sport and fitness self-improvement of students in professional physical culture and sport training system based on kinesisenergonomic approach]. Izvestiya Yuzhnogo federalnogo universiteta. 2015, no. 7, pp. 77-89.
3. Ioakimidi Y.A. Vliyanie tsennostnykh orientatsiy na formirovanie professionalno-pedagogicheskoy napravlennosti lichnosti spetsialista po fizicheskoy kulture i sportu [Effect of value orientations on formation of professional-pedagogical orientation of expert perspnality in physical culture and sports]. Innovatsionnye preobrazovaniya v sfere fizicheskoy kultury, sporta i turizma. Nauch. tr. Yubileynoy XV Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. kongress-konf. [Innovative transformations in the sphere of physical culture, sport and tourism. Proc. Jubilee XV Intern. res.-pract. congress-conf.], Novomikhailovsky set., 2012, 149 p.
4. Karvunis Yu.A., Kapilevich L.V. Formirovanie obschekulturnykh kompetentsiy na zanyatiyakh sportivno-ozdorovitelnym turizmom [General cultural competence building at sport and health tourism sessions]. Teoriya i praktika fiz. kultury, 2016, no. 6, pp. 89-90.
5. Karpova N.V. Osobennosti formirovaniya professionalnoy identichnosti budushchikh uchiteley fizicheskoy kultury [Future physical education teacher's professional identity formation specifics]. Teoriya i praktika fiz. kultury, 2016, no. 4, pp. 52-53.
6. Lomovtseva O.V. Formirovanie professionalnykh kompetentsiy u budushchego bakalavra po fizicheskoy kulture i sportu [Formation of Vocational Competences in Future Bachelor in Physical Culture and Sport]. Teoriya i praktika fiz. kultury, 2011, no. 2, p. 39.
7. Lubysheva L.I., Zagrevskaya A.I. Struktura i soderzhanie sportivnoy kulturyi lichnosti [Structure and Content of Personal Sports Culture]. Teoriya i praktika fiz. kultury, 2013, no. 3, pp. 7-15.
8. Lubysheva L.I. Kompetentnostny podkhod v obrazovanii: za i protiv [Competency building approach in education: pros and cons]. Teoriya i praktika fiz. kultury, 2016, no. 6, p. 93.
9. Lukiyanenko V.P. Na ostrie problem realizatsii kompetentnostnogo podkhoda v sisteme fizkulturnogo obrazovaniya Rossii [Pressing problems of implementation of competency-building approach within Russian physical education system]. Teoriya i praktika fiz. kultury, 2016, no. 6, pp. 94-96.
10. Matrosova O.Yu. Kompetentnostnaya model podgotovki spetsialista po fizicheskoy kulture i sportu [Competence Model of Training Experts in Physical Culture and Sport]. Teoriya i praktika fiz. kultury, 2011, no. 2, p. 17.
11. Opletin A.A. Samorazvitie studentov v protsesse zanyatiy fizicheskoy kulturoy [Personal development of students at physical education lessons]. Teoriya i praktika fiz. kultury, 2016, no. 6, pp. 96.
12. Romanov V.A. Didakticheskaya model kak osnova professionalnoy podgotovki sportsmenov v sisteme fizicheskogo vospitaniya v vuze [Didactic model as a basis for professional athletic training in university physical education system]. Teoriya i praktika fiz. kultury, 2016, no. 1, p.75.
13. Sushchenko V.P., Shchegolev V.A., Korshunov A.V. Osobennosti lichnostno-professionalnogo razvitiya razlichnykh kategoriy spetsialistov po fizicheskoy kulture i sportu [Specifics of personal professional development of physical education and sports specialists of different types]. Teoriya i praktika fiz. kultury, 2016, no. 6, pp. 3-5.
14. Chermit K.D., S.K. Bondyreva, A.A. Gorelov Kvalifikatsionnaya rabota bakalavra: Algoritm vypolneniya v skhemakh. Ucheb. posobie [Bachelor's qualifying paper: algorithm implementation in schemes. Study guide]. Moscow: Moscow Psychological and Social Institute publ., 2015, 154 p.