Regulation of respiratory function of students with different physical activity levels
Фотографии:
ˑ:
PhD R.A. Gaynullin1
Professor, Dr.Biol. A.P. Isaev2
Associate Professor, PhD V.V. Erlikh3
Postgraduate J.B. Korableva3
1Bashkir State University, Ufa
2Research Center of Sports Science, South Ural State University, Chelyabinsk
3Institute of Sport, Tourism and Service, South Ural State University, Chelyabinsk
Abstract
There is a debate in modern medical science about the appropriateness of the semantics of norm that has over 300 definitions. Practical (individual, gender) recommendations are provided for correcting condition and fitness level. Breathing function manifests itself differently in three health groups with their specific features. It is on a prioritized high level of functioning in the 1st group, on low and middle levels – in the 2nd group and on an extremely low level – in the 3rd health group. From this we can conclude that sustainment of students of the 3rd and 2nd health groups requires a large energy consumption. Their vitality is at the lower border of biological reliability, and life preservation depends on the redistribution of functions, changes in the regulatory processes of the integrative functioning of the body providing health and safety.
Keywords: external breathing function, analysis of variance, comparative inter- and intragroup values, diagrams of mean values, variability of values, reference limits, norm.
Introduction. Individuality, according to R. Williams (1960), is a deviation from the norm. Genetic polymorphism indicates ranges of variability within reference limits: “There is nothing more uncertain than normal human behavior” [1]. The amorphousness of the norm is seen in everyday practice. The approach from the point of view of the norm has proven to be ineffective.
Research method and organization. First-year students aged 17-19 were subject to studies. Examination of the external breathing function (EBF) was carried out using the “Eton” apparatus (Russia) [4].
Results and discussion. Research results are presented in Table 1 and Figure 1 (the comparison was conducted in three health groups).
Table 1. Analysis of variance of breathing function of students
Compared indicators |
Sum of squares |
st. conn. |
Mean square |
F |
Value |
|
Expiratory reserve volume |
Inter-group |
0.202 |
2 |
0.101 |
0.512 |
0.605 |
Intra-group |
5.317 |
27 |
0.197 |
|
|
|
Total |
5.519 |
29 |
|
|
|
|
Inspiratory capacity/l |
Inter-group |
0.228 |
2 |
0.114 |
0.165 |
0.849 |
Intra-group |
18.683 |
27 |
0.692 |
|
|
|
Total |
18.911 |
29 |
|
|
|
|
Expiratory forced vital capacity/l |
Inter-group |
2.892 |
2 |
1.446 |
2.095 |
0.143 |
Intra-group |
18.635 |
27 |
0.690 |
|
|
|
Total |
21.527 |
29 |
|
|
|
|
Cardiac output 25, l/s |
Inter-group |
4.684 |
2 |
2.342 |
0.800 |
0.459 |
Intra-group |
78.987 |
27 |
2.925 |
|
|
|
Total |
83.671 |
29 |
|
|
|
|
Cardiac output 50, l/s |
Inter-group |
2.804 |
2 |
1.402 |
1.777 |
0.188 |
Intra-group |
21.300 |
27 |
0.789 |
|
|
|
Total |
24.104 |
29 |
|
|
|
|
Cardiac output 75, l/s |
Inter-group |
0.534 |
2 |
0.267 |
0.382 |
0.686 |
Intra-group |
18.865 |
27 |
0.699 |
|
|
|
Total |
19.399 |
29 |
|
|
|
|
Tiffeneau index, % |
Inter-group |
309.415 |
2 |
154.708 |
1.955 |
0.161 |
Intra-group |
2136.312 |
27 |
79.123 |
|
|
|
Total |
2445.728 |
29 |
|
|
|
|
Gaensler index, % |
Inter-group |
71.975 |
2 |
35.988 |
0.844 |
0.441 |
Intra-group |
1151.480 |
27 |
42.547 |
|
|
|
Total |
1223.455 |
29 |
|
|
|
|
Peak expiratory flow rate/s |
Inter-group |
0.627 |
2 |
0.313 |
0.165 |
0.849 |
Intra-group |
51.388 |
27 |
1.903 |
|
|
|
Total |
52.014 |
29 |
|
|
|
|
Mean flow rate 0.2-1.2 |
Inter-group |
1.684 |
2 |
0.842 |
0.453 |
0.640 |
Intra-group |
50.166 |
27 |
1.858 |
|
|
|
Total |
51.850 |
29 |
|
|
|
|
Mean flow rate 25-75 |
Inter-group |
0.369 |
2 |
0.185 |
0.461 |
0.636 |
Intra-group |
10.813 |
27 |
0.400 |
|
|
|
Total |
11.182 |
29 |
|
|
|
|
Mean flow rate 75-85 |
Inter-group |
13.593 |
2 |
6.796 |
11.018 |
0.000 |
Intra-group |
16.654 |
27 |
0.617 |
|
|
|
Total |
30.246 |
29 |
|
|
|
|
FEV/Inspiratory FVC |
Inter-group |
50.073 |
2 |
25.037 |
0.158 |
0.855 |
Intra-group |
4289.724 |
27 |
158.879 |
|
|
|
Total |
4339.797 |
29 |
|
|
|
|
Peak inspiratory flow rate |
Inter-group |
5.426 |
2 |
2.713 |
1.693 |
0.203 |
Intra-group |
43.272 |
27 |
1.603 |
|
|
|
Total |
48.698 |
29 |
|
|
|
|
Inspiratory cardiac output 50 |
Inter-group |
0.515 |
2 |
0.258 |
0.251 |
0.780 |
Intra-group |
27.709 |
27 |
1.026 |
|
|
|
Total |
28.225 |
29 |
|
|
|
|
Maximum breathing capacity |
Inter-group |
1844.902 |
2 |
922.451 |
5.811 |
0.008 |
Intra-group |
4285.800 |
27 |
158.733 |
|
|
|
Total |
6130.703 |
29 |
|
|
|
Pulmonary ventilation when assessing the dynamic characteristics – volume, speed and time together form breathing patterns. Mechanics of pulmonary ventilation is thoroughly studied in modern physiology [3]. Breathing is determined by respiratory muscles, the volume of ventilated air, breathing resistance, overcoming by contractions of these muscles [1]. In assessing the breathing function they distinguish static volumes and capacity (total lung capacity, vital capacity, respiratory and reserve volume, inspiratory capacity, functional residual capacity). Ventilation, diffusion, perfusion and tissue respiration collectively include external and tissue breathing. Ergospirometry is one of the methods of breathing function assessment [5]. Physical exercise tolerance reflects the degree of adaptive capability of a student and the ability to overcome the proposed load.
Hereby is an example of distribution of the mean reserve breathing volume by groups (1-3). Twenty-two indicators of the breathing function were analyzed.
Figure 1. Diagrams of mean values
Variance correctly characterizes the scatter if the set has a normal distribution. Dispersions of δ2 set with F close to 1. The null hypothesis is rejected in such indicators as expiratory FVC, cardiac output 50, Tiffeneau index, mean flow rate 75-85, inspiratory peak flow rate, maximum breathing capacity.
Indicators of external breathing presented in the diagrams can be differentiated by input into the breathing patterns. Thus, the following indicators were high in the 1st group: expiratory reserve volume, inspiratory capacity, cardiac output 50, 75, Gaensler index, mean flow rate 0.2-1.2, mean flow rate 25, 75, mean time of peak flow rate, maximum breathing capacity, mean expiratory flow rate, ratio of cardiac output 50 to vital capacity, mean expiratory FVC, mean forced expiratory volume per second. Therefore, the breathing pattern included volume, speed and time characteristics in the 1st health group. Average and low indicators were observed in the 1st health group. Accordingly, high breathing indicators accounted for 57.14 %, while the moderate and low ones - for 42.86 %.
In the second group high values were detected in the following indicators: cardiac output 25, Tiffeneau index, peak expiratory flow rate, mean flow rate 75-85, FEV 0.5 seconds, temporary expiratory vital capacity, average time of transition, ratio of cardiac output 50 to forced vital capacity. In the second group high values accounted for 28.57 %, moderate and low – for 71.43 %. In the third group only 10.71% of subjects had high values, and 89.29% had them at moderate and low levels.
Conclusion. The breathing function manifests itself differently in three health groups with their specific features. It is on a prioritized high level of functioning in the 1st group, on low and moderate levels – in the 2nd group and on an extremely low level – in the 3rd health group. From this we can conclude that sustainment of students of the 3rd and 2nd health groups requires a large energy consumption. Their vitality is at the lower border of biological reliability, and life preservation depends on the redistribution of functions, changes in the regulatory processes of the integrative functioning of the body providing health and safety.
The work was supported by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation within the framework of the basic part of the state task (project code – 1696).
References
- Amosov A.M. Fizicheskaya aktivnost' i serdtse (Physical activity and heart) - 3rd ed. rev. and sup. / A.M. Amosov, A.Ya. Bendet. – Kiev: Zdorov'e, 1989. – 216 p.
- Breslav I.S. Dykhanie i myshechnaya aktivnost' cheloveka v sporte: rukovodstvo dlya izuchayushchikh fiziologiyu cheloveka (Breathing and muscular activity of athlete: guide for human physiology students) / I.S. Breslav, N.I. Voyakov, R.V. Tambovtseva. – Moscow: Sovetskiy sport, 2013. – 336 p.
- Guyton A.C. Meditsinskaya fiziologiya (Medical Physiology) / A.C. Guyton, J.E. Hall. – Moscow: Logosfera, 2008. – 1296 p.
- Nefedov V.B. Rabochaya instruktsiya po provedeniyu i interpretatsii rezul'tatov issledovaniya funktsii legkikh na apparate serii «Eton» (Operating instructions for studies and interpretation of the results of pulmonary function tests using "Eton" apparatus) / V.B. Nefedov. – Moscow, 2001. – 53 p.
- Syrkin A.L. Rukovodstvo po funktsional'noy diagnostike bolezney serdtsa: nauch. – prakt. posobie po kardiologii (Cardiac disease functional diagnostics guide: theoretical and practical guide on cardiology) / A.L. Syrkin, M.G. Poltavskaya, N.A. Novikova, V.P. Sedov / Ed. by A.L. Syrkin. – Moscow: Zolotoy standart, 2009. – 368 p.
- Williams R. Biokhimicheskaya individual'nost': monografiya (Biochemical identity: Monograph) / R. Williams; transl. from English. - Moscow: Inostrannaya literatura, 1960. – 234 p.
- Ushakov, A.S. Sravnitel'ny analiz pokazateley fizicheskoy podgotovlennosti uchashchikhsya 11-kh klassov i studentov 1-go kursa obucheniya (Physical fitness of 11-graders and 1st-year students: comparative analysis) / A.S. Ushakov, A.V. Nenasheva, N.E. Kleshchenkova // Vestnik YuUrGU. Seriya «Obrazovanie, zdravookhranenie, fizicheskaya kul'tura» (SUSU Bulletin. "Education, health care, physical culture" series). – Chelyabinsk, SUSU Publishing Center, 2014. – V. 14, № 2. – P. 114-118.