Test Tasks to Control Physical Fitness of Elite Handball Players
Фотографии:
ˑ:
V.Ya. Ignatieva, Honored Master of Sport of the USSR, professor, Dr.Hab., Honored Worker of Physical Culture
Russian State University of Physical Culture, Sport, Tourism and Youth (SCOLIPhC), Moscow
R.R. Minabutdinov, Honored Trainer of Udmurtia, Master of Sport of Russia, Trainer of Masters' Team of Izhevsk
Key words: elite skills, individual sports shape, physical fitness, control test tasks.
Relevance. Sports shape formation in sports games must be controlled using test indices over the periods of development of sports shape. The data on fitness of elite female handball players are available in the works of the handball experts [1-5]. However, all of them give different recommendations on the team control.
The purpose of the present research was to analyze physical fitness of elite female handball players.
Physical fitness of female handball players was studied using a set of twenty tests, which characterize speed, speed-strength skills, endurance and coordination abilities of female athletes. According to the results of the correlation analysis, 9 tests were selected to control physical fitness of elite female handball players (Tab. 1).
The researchers' objective was to identify the specific features of the state of female handball players with different playing positions and body length in the competitive period. The data on the players' fitness are given in Table 2 and their ratio - in Fig. 1.
The fastest in the distance were the wings who had a lead of 4% (р>0,05) as compared to the left and right backs, of 12% (р<0,001) - as compared to the pivots, and of 6% (р<0,01) - as compared to the goalkeepers. The results shown by the pivots were significantly lower than those of the goalkeepers - by 6%.
The best dribbling time in the same distance was set by the wings who were ahead of the backs by 3%, of the pivots - by 7% (р<0,001) and of the goalkeepers - by 5% (р<0,001). The pivots and the goalkeepers lagged behind the backs in dribbling by 5% (р<0,01). In terms of the speed endurance test "100-meter shuttle run" the pivots delivered inferior results, however, the diversity of players of other positions is unreliable. On completion of the test "6-minute run", the results of the pivots turned out to be lower by 10% (<0,01) in comparison with the rest of the players on the field. In accordance with the test "Jump with no arm swing", the explosive leg force is the strongest among the backs, and the weakest among the goalkeepers. These differences make up 2-4%.
Table 1. Correlative interrelations between indices of physical fitness of female handball players of masters' team
Indices |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
30 meter sprint |
* |
412 |
358 |
-758 |
528 |
-373 |
-555 |
-135 |
-590 |
-216 |
-503 |
-502 |
040 |
-308 |
659 |
-063 |
063 |
-069 |
662 |
-394 |
400 meter dash |
412 |
* |
488 |
-412 |
316 |
-325 |
005 |
-037 |
-320 |
-143 |
232 |
-527 |
-615 |
-085 |
593 |
167 |
206 |
036 |
711 |
-238 |
800 meter dash |
358 |
488 |
* |
-516 |
582 |
-551 |
-180 |
-331 |
-470 |
-189 |
156 |
-482 |
-590 |
396 |
267 |
332 |
-007 |
230 |
544 |
246 |
6-minute run |
-758 |
-412 |
-516 |
* |
-610 |
342 |
261 |
-193 |
299 |
-055 |
314 |
612 |
013 |
001 |
-357 |
-113 |
-082 |
-294 |
-635 |
490 |
5 х 10m shuttle run |
528 |
316 |
582 |
-610 |
* |
-153 |
-148 |
-086 |
-062 |
-211 |
-361 |
-563 |
068 |
-270 |
239 |
269 |
244 |
419 |
574 |
060 |
Long jump |
-373 |
-325 |
-551 |
342 |
-153 |
* |
744 |
406 |
664 |
391 |
079 |
441 |
472 |
-462 |
-307 |
221 |
164 |
-123 |
-465 |
038 |
Jump with no arm swing |
-555 |
005 |
-180 |
261 |
-148 |
744 |
* |
425 |
630 |
392 |
034 |
125 |
037 |
-041 |
-237 |
466 |
307 |
130 |
-228 |
-007 |
Triple jump |
-135 |
-037 |
-331 |
-193 |
-086 |
406 |
425 |
* |
715 |
529 |
-112 |
-177 |
533 |
008 |
-141 |
430 |
519 |
598 |
089 |
-338 |
10-hop jump |
-590 |
-320 |
-470 |
299 |
-062 |
664 |
630 |
715 |
* |
340 |
119 |
152 |
536 |
-178 |
-487 |
403 |
419 |
456 |
-327 |
-095 |
Abalakov jump |
-216 |
-143 |
-189 |
-055 |
-211 |
391 |
392 |
529 |
340 |
* |
193 |
263 |
298 |
102 |
-148 |
370 |
346 |
131 |
-180 |
-187 |
20-second push-ups |
-503 |
-232 |
156 |
314 |
-361 |
-079 |
034 |
-112 |
119 |
193 |
* |
579 |
-317 |
468 |
-531 |
100 |
-287 |
-201 |
-574 |
534 |
40-second push-ups |
-502 |
-527 |
-482 |
612 |
-563 |
441 |
125 |
-117 |
152 |
263 |
579 |
* |
084 |
000 |
-590 |
-330 |
-458 |
-602 |
-922 |
384 |
Push-ups and sit-ups |
040 |
-615 |
-590 |
013 |
068 |
472 |
037 |
533 |
536 |
298 |
-317 |
084 |
* |
-364 |
-176 |
109 |
372 |
310 |
-185 |
-181 |
Jackknife sit ups |
-308 |
-085 |
396 |
001 |
-270 |
-462 |
-041 |
008 |
-178 |
102 |
468 |
000 |
-364 |
* |
-318 |
025 |
-206 |
308 |
-081 |
230 |
30-meter dribbling |
659 |
593 |
267 |
-357 |
239 |
-307 |
-237 |
-141 |
-487 |
-148 |
531 |
-590 |
-175 |
-318 |
* |
287 |
470 |
-052 |
766 |
-504 |
Right-handed ball throw |
-063 |
167 |
332 |
-113 |
269 |
221 |
466 |
430 |
403 |
370 |
100 |
-330 |
109 |
025 |
287 |
* |
803 |
500 |
335 |
036 |
Left-handed ball throw |
063 |
206 |
-007 |
-082 |
244 |
164 |
307 |
519 |
419 |
346 |
-287 |
-458 |
372 |
-206 |
470 |
803 |
* |
562 |
470 |
-269 |
Double-handed throw |
-069 |
036 |
230 |
-294 |
419 |
-123 |
130 |
598 |
456 |
131 |
-201 |
-602 |
310 |
308 |
-052 |
500 |
562 |
* |
439 |
-042 |
100-meter shuttle run |
662 |
711 |
544 |
-635 |
574 |
-465 |
-228 |
089 |
-327 |
-180 |
-574 |
-922 |
185 |
-081 |
766 |
335 |
470 |
439 |
* |
-356 |
Cooper test |
-394 |
-238 |
246 |
490 |
060 |
038 |
-007 |
-338 |
095 |
-187 |
534 |
384 |
-181 |
230 |
-504 |
036 |
-269 |
-042 |
-356 |
* |
Table 2. Indices of physical fitness of female handball players of different playing positions in competitive period (Х±σ)
Examined indices |
|
Playing positions |
|||
|
Wings n=10 |
Backs n=12 |
Pivots n=8 |
Goalkeepers n=8 |
|
30 meter sprint, sec |
Х
|
4,4±0,05 |
4,47±0,23 |
4,85±0,05 |
4,56±0,13 |
р |
* |
|
<0,001 |
<0,01 |
|
|
* |
<0,05 |
|
||
|
|
* |
<0,05 |
||
30-meter dribbling, sec |
Х
|
4,57±0,14 |
4,67±0,09 |
4,87±0,08 |
4,8±0,07 |
р |
* |
|
<0,001 |
<0,001 |
|
|
* |
<0,01 |
<0,01 |
||
100-meter shuttle run, sec |
Х
|
25,54±0,7 |
25,9±0,98 |
26,27±0,99 |
25,55±1,16 |
6-minute run, m |
Х
|
1598±72,2 |
1533±79,9 |
1462±124 |
1637±41,4 |
р |
|
|
* |
<0,01 |
|
Jump with no arm swing, cm |
Х
|
166,4±10,9 |
168,6±7,93 |
165,2±19,8 |
162,2±6,41 |
40-second push-ups, number of reps |
Х
|
30,8±2,99 |
29,1±5,84 |
24,7±4,02 |
34±1,87 |
р |
* |
|
<0,01 |
<0,01 |
|
|
* |
|
<0,05 |
||
|
|
* |
<0,001 |
||
Push-ups and sit-ups, number of reps |
Х
|
24,2±4,3 |
21,5±2,56 |
23,2±5,62 |
23,2±5,67 |
1 kg ball throw, right-handed, m |
Х
|
18,3±1,07 |
19,5±2,21 |
19,2±2,68 |
20,7±1,78 |
Seated ball throw, double-handed, m |
Х
|
7,94±0,19 |
8,43±0,98 |
7,95±0,58 |
8,15±0,84 |
In terms of strength abilities and strength endurance the goalkeepers deliver the best results. On completion of the 40-second push-ups test, their results turned out to be higher than those in the rest playing positions: they had a lead of 10% (р<0,05) as compared to the wings, of 15% (р<0,01) as compared to the backs, of 27% (р<0,001) as compared to the pivots. In this test, the pivots also lagged behind the wings by 20% (р<0,01). During the second strength test "Push-ups and sit-ups", it was the wings who did the exercise the largest number of times, having gotten ahead of the backs by 11% and of the pivots and the goalkeepers - by 4%. However, the diversity of the test results is unreliable.
In the right-handed ball throw test, the goalkeepers exceeded the results of the outfield players: of the wings - by 12%, of the backs and the pivots - by 6%. The backs were the ones to throw the 1 kg ball, double-handed, seated, for the maximum distance, having gotten a lead of 6% as compared to the wings and the pivots, and only of 3% as compared to the goalkeeper (р>0,05).
Fig. 1. Correlation of indices of physical fitness of female handball players of different playing positions from the team under study.
The body length range within female elite handball teams is wide: from 164 cm to 194 cm, and that determines the players' individual characteristics. For this reason, the analysis of physical fitness of female handball players with different body length was conducted: medium height - 165-175 cm, above-average height - 176-180 cm and tall - over 180 cm (Table 2)
Table 3. Indices of physical fitness of female handball players with different body length (Х±σ)
Examined indices |
Body length, cm |
||
165-175 n=16 |
175-180 n=12 |
Over 180 n=10 |
|
30 meter sprint, sec |
4,44±0,16 |
4,61±0,17 |
4,72±0,24 |
* |
<0,05 |
<0,01 |
|
30-meter dribbling, sec |
4,62±0,13 |
4,8±0,08 |
4,76±0,16 |
* |
<0,01 |
<0,05 |
|
6-minute run, m |
1592±59,31 |
1625±62,9 |
1410±80 |
* |
<0,05 |
<0,05 |
|
|
* |
<0,001 |
|
100-meter shuttle run, sec |
25,36±0,6 |
25,96±0,98 |
26,34±1,2 |
Jump with no arm swing, cm |
168,6±9,15 |
166,8±1,41 |
160,8±12,74 |
40-second push-ups, number of reps |
32,6±3,83 |
28,3±6,04 |
26,6±2,93 |
* |
<0,05 |
<0,01 |
|
Push-ups and sit-ups, number of reps |
22,6±4,27 |
22,1±5,27 |
24,4±4,45 |
1 kg ball throw, right-handed, m |
18,8±1,86 |
19±2,23 |
20,8±1,93 |
* |
|
<0,05 |
|
1 kg ball throw, double- handed, m |
7,96±0,73 |
7,8±0,5 |
8,84±0,61 |
In 30 meter sprint the athletes with medium height are ahead of the tall ones by 6% (р<0,01) and of the ones with above-average height - by 4% (р<0,05), and while dribbling - by 3% and by 4% accordingly.
Based on the results of the test "100-meter shuttle run", it was determined that the females 165-174 cm tall were slightly ahead of both groups of the handball players with different body length, but this diversity is unreliable. And during the 6-minute run, the tall female handball players lagged significantly in general endurance behind both the ones with medium height - by 13% (р<0,001) and the above-average height - by 11%. The female handball players with above-average body length turned out to have a little more endurance as compared to the ones with medium height.
According to the "Jump" test there was no significant difference in explosive leg power in all the groups of female handball players. However, this index is higer in the athletes with medium height who got ahead of the tall ones by 5%, and only by 1% of the players of above average hight.
In accordance with the 40-second push-ups, the strength index is the highest in the female handball players with medium height, they are stronger than the players with above average height by 13% (р<0,05), and the tall ones - by 19% (р<0,01). During the "Push-ups and sit-ups" the tall athletes were ahead of the ones with medium height by 7%, and above average height - by 10%.
The "1 kg ball throw" test showed that the tall female handball players possess distinctive excellence. By the right-handed throw index they are ahead of the ones with medium height by 10% (р<0,05), and the ones of above average height - by 9% (р>0,05). They are also ahead according to the results of the test "Seated ball throw, double-handed".
Conclusion.
Six major tests can be recommended for control of physical fitness of female handball players. These are "30 meter sprint", "30-meter dribbling", "Jump with no arm swing", "100-meter shuttle run", "40-second push-ups", "1 kg ball throw", which is most similar in the structure to the movement handball throw.
Regarding the role, the pivots were the least fit in speed and strength tests. The wings were the fastest and most extreme players. The goalkeepers, who are already being trained according to the special program, need customizing physical training.
The tall players are lagging behind the short handball players in terms of speed, have lower general and strength endurance, but are ahead of other age groups in the distance of ball throwing. The short athletes were the fastest and the best in jumps, but with smaller capacities of ball throwing. The female handball players with medium height took the intermediate position on completion of the testing, having gotten ahead of both groups in the general endurance index.
While controlling physical fitness of female handball players, the main thing is not to accelerate training of the players with lower indices, but to monitor the dynamics of their getting in shape with due account for their specific features and individual characteristics.
References
- Alizar, T.A. Individualization of training of elite female handball players goalkeepers: abstract of Ph.D. thesis / T.A. Alizar. – Moscow, 2009. – 24 P. (In Russian)
- Bukhtiy, L.G. Modeling of the training process of female handball players in view of the specific biological function of the female body: abstract of Ph.D. thesis / L.G. Bukhtiy. – Kiev, 1991. – 21 P. (In Russian)
- Handball. The program for groups of sports perfection and elite sports skills / Ed. by V.Ya. Ignatieva. – Moscow: Sovetsky sport, 2004. – 90 P. (In Russian)
- Ignatieva, V.Ya. Standards of physical fitness of elite female handball players of different playing positions in game / V.Ya. Ignatieva, E.O. Savinkov // Teoriya i praktika fizicheskoy kultury. – 2002. – № 6. – P. 25-26, 39. (In Russian)
Corresponding author: otrada116@mail.ru