Why might high-intensity interval training be attractive to the recreationally inactive contingent?

ˑ: 

PhD A.V. Moment
Pskov State University, Pskov

Objective of the study was to objectify the dynamics of affective valence in a group of healthy recreationally inactive females in response to low-volume, high-intensity interval training with their own body weight (whole-body HIIT).
Methods and structure of the study. Recreational-inactive healthy female students (n=11) who met the inclusion criteria took part in the experiment. Affective valence, heart rate and external parameters of physical activity were recorded.
Results and conclusions. Affective valence significantly decreased from 3.0 (3.0–3.0) to 0.0 (-1.0–1.0) points after overcoming the 85% threshold of the maximum predicted heart rate value, but after a cool-down (( 3.0 (3.0–5.0) points)) the majority of subjects (54.5%) felt better than before the training ((3.0 (2.0–3.0) points)), which confirms presence of affective rebound. Thus, it is fair to conclude that the state of affective elation experienced after training may be one of the factors of adherence to low-volume whole-body HIIT.

Keywords: affective rebound, low-volume whole-body HIIT, recreationally inactive students.

References

  1. Moment A.V. Psikhofiziologicheskiye i affektivnyye reaktsii studentok na korotkiye vysokointensivnyye intervalnyye trenirovki s vesom sobstvennogo tela [Psychophysiological and affective reactions of female students to short high-intensity interval training with their own body weight]. Teoriya i praktika fizicheskoy kultury. 2023. No. 5. pp. 36-38.
  2. Biddle SJH. Let’s HIT it on the head! Why high intensity exercise is not a viable public health strategy. In: ISBNPA Abstract Book. Edinburgh. 2015. p. 32.
  3. Box A.G., Feito Y., Zenko Z., Petruzzello S.J. The affective interval: An investigation of the peaks and valleys during high- and moderate-intensity interval exercise in regular exercisers. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2020. No. 49.
  4. Buchheit M., Laursen P. High-Intensity Interval Training, Solutions to the Programming Puzzle. Sports Medicine. 2013. Vol. 43(5). pp. 313-338.
  5. Craig A.D. How do you feel? Interoception: The sense of the physiological condition of the body. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2002. Vol. 3(8). pp. 655-666.
  6. Dierkes K., Rösel I., Giel K.E., Thiel A., Sudeck G. Does Exercise Modality Matter Affectively? Contrasting Type and Sequence of Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training Versus High-Intensity Interval Training in a Randomized Within-Subject Study. J Sports Sci Med. 2023/ Mar 1;22 (1). pp. 84-97.
  7. Ekkekakis P., Hartman M.E., Ladwig M.A. A methodological checklist for studies of pleasure and enjoyment responses to high-intensity interval training: Part I. participants and measures. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology. 2023. No. 45(2). pp. 77-91.
  8. Ekkekakis P. Pleasure and displeasure from the body: Perspectives from exercise. Cognition & Emotion - COGNITION EMOTION. 2003. No. 17. pp. 213-239.
  9. Gildea N., McDermott A., Rocha J., Crognale D. Low-volume HIIT and MICT speed V̇O2 kinetics during high-intensity "work-to-work" cycling with a similar time-course in type 2 diabetes. Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md.: 1985). 2022. No. 133.
  10. Hall E. E., Ekkekakis P., Petruzzello S. J. The affective beneficence of vigorous exercise revisited. British Journal of Health Psychology. 2002. No. 7(1). pp. 47-66.
  11. Metcalfe R., Williams S., Fernandes G., Astorino T., et al. Affecting Effects on Affect: The Impact of Protocol Permutations on Affective Responses to Sprint Interval Exercise; A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Pooled Individual Participant Data. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living. 2022. Vol. 4.
  12. Zenko Z., Ladwig M. Affective responses to exercise: Measurement considerations for practicing professionals. 2021.