PhD, Associate Professor V.V. Lobanov¹
Dr. Hab., Professor V.I. Revyakina^1
1Tomsk State Pedagogical University, Tomsk

Objective of the study was to reveal the features and possibilities of using a specialized environment for educating a sports team using art pedagogy methods.
Methods and structure of the study. The study was carried out using the example of teams whose core activity is fencing. The authors proceed from the idea that the aestheticization of the competitive process is not a sufficient basis for the effective education of a team in terms of the ideas of art pedagogy, as a result of which targeted managerial and organizational-pedagogical efforts are necessary to create an aesthetically valuable subject-spatial content of the training process.
Results and conclusions. An analysis of the practice of sports groups (“Victoria”, “Musketeers of Setuni”, “Florette”, “Musketeer”) made it possible to establish the educational feasibility of including students both in the existing specialized environment, aesthetically reflecting sports activity, and in the processes of creating such an environment, which as a result acquires unique proportionality to a specific team. Also, as a result of the study, it was revealed that the universalization of sports facilities reduces the effectiveness of using the environmental approach and methods of art pedagogy for educational work in sports teams.

Keywords: history of sports pedagogy, sports team, education in a sports team, environmental approach in fencing, art pedagogy in sports.

References

1. Kolchanova T.I. Fekhtovaniye v litsakh [Fencing in faces]. Moscow: “Glossa-K” publ., 2002. 220 p.
2. Leitman L.G. Mushketery Setuni [Musketeers of Setun]. Moscow: [n.p.], 2007. 256 p.
3. Lobanov V.V. Antichnyye idealy vospitaniya grazhdanina-voina v kollektivakh artisticheskogo fekhtovaniya [Ancient ideals of educating a citizen-warrior in artistic fencing groups]. Teoriya i praktika fizicheskoy kultury. 2017. No. 10. pp. 46-48.
4. Lowe B. Krasota sporta: mezhdistsiplinarnoye issledovaniye [The beauty of sport: an interdisciplinary study]. I.L. Monicheva [transl.]; V.I. Stolyarova [ed.]. Moscow: Raduga publ., 1984. 256 p.
5. Mochalov B.V. Istoriya razvitiya fekhtovaniya v Yekaterinburge (1941-1997) [History of the development of fencing in Yekaterinburg (1941-1997)]. Ekaterinburg: UrO RAN publ., 2000. 196 p.
6. Nikonova S.B. Estetizatsiya kak paradigma sovremennosti. Filosofsko-esteticheskiy analiz transformatsionnykh protsessov v sovremennoy kulture [Aestheticization as a paradigm of modernity. Philosophical and aesthetic analysis of transformation processes in modern culture]. Doct. diss. abstract (Phil.). St. Petersburg, 2013. 42 p.
7. Rush K.B. Priglasheniye k boyu [Invitation to fight]. Moscow: Sovetskaya Rossiya publ., 1984. 128 p.
8. Sleptsov P.V. Ot yunosti k zrelosti (K sorokaletiyu fekhtovalnogo kluba «Viktoriya») [From youth to maturity (To the fortieth anniversary of the Victoria fencing club)]. Novosibirsk: Victoriya publ, 2008. 50 p.
9. Fekhtovaniye: dopolnitelnaya obshcherazvivayushchaya programma v oblasti fizicheskoy kultury i sporta dlya realizatsii v organizatsiyakh dopolnitelnogo obrazovaniya v gruppakh sportivno-ozdorovitelnogo etapa podgotovki [Fencing: an additional general developmental program in the field of physical culture and sports for implementation in organizations of additional education in groups of the sports and health training stage]. Moscow: Chelovek publ., 2015. 56 p.