PhD, Associate Professor N.V. Pashkova¹
Dr. Hab., Associate Professor M.D. Kudryavtsev^{1, 2, 3}
Dr. Hab., Professor A.V. Gaskov⁴
PhD, Associate Professor V.V. Deniskin^5
1Siberian Federal University, Krasnoyarsk
²Siberian State University of Science and Technology named after V.I. Academician M.F. Reshetnev, Krasnoyarsk
³Siberian Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, Krasnoyarsk
⁴Buryat State University named after Dorzhi Banzarov, Ulan-Ude
⁵Krasnoyarsk State Agrarian University, Krasnoyarsk

Abstract
Objective of the study was to analyze benefits of the frame primary school physical education service model sensitive to the age-specific physical fitness progress stages.
Methods and structure of the study. The frame primary school physical education service model testing experiment was run at Secondary School No. 2 in Krasnoyarsk. Later on the experimental physical education model was used as a basis for the school physical education curriculum piloted by a practical physical education project. Individual physical fitness progress of the sample was tested in the elective Extracurricular Physical Education Service Project.
Results and conclusion. Having processed the progress monitoring data versus the pre-experimental physical education statistics, we presented the data in a diagram showing the group physical fitness variations for the 4-year period. The 4-year frame primary school physical education service model piloting experiment showed 93% of the EG making progress in the pre- versus post-experimental physical fitness tests – versus 65% in the RG trained in traditional format.

Keywords: concept, physical education, primary school students, sports groups, physical fitness, physical education.

References

1. Arzumanov S.G. Fizicheskoe vospitanie v shkole: prakticheskie sovety prepodavatelyam [School physical education: practical advice for teachers]. Feniks publ., 2009. 200 p.
2. Bogen M.M., Matveyev L.P. Osnovy obucheniya dvigatelnym deystviyam [Basics of teaching motor actions]. Teoriya i metodika fizicheskoy kultury [Theory and methodology of physical education]. Moscow: Fizkultura i sport publ., 1991. pp. 114-130.
3. Elkonin D.B., Davydov V.V. [ed.] Vozrastnye vozmozhnosti usvoeniya znaniy [Age possibilities of knowledge assimilation]. Study guide. Moscow: Prosveshchenie publ., 1966. 125 p.
4. Zheleznyak Y.D., Kunyanskiy V.A., Chachin A.V. Voleybol [Volleyball]. Methodical manual for teaching the game. Moscow: Tera-Sport, Olimpiya Press publ., 2005. 112 p.
5. Kovalko V.I. Pourochnye razrabotki po fizkulture 2-y klass [Physical education lesson development. Grade 2]. VAKO publ., 2006. 145 p.
6. Lyakh V.I., Zdanevich A.A. Kompleksnaya programma fizicheskogo vospitaniya uchashchikhsya 1-11 klassov [Comprehensive physical education program for in grades 1-11 students]. Moscow: Prosveshchenie publ., 2008. 53 p.