PhD, Associate Professor L.A. Akimova¹
PhD, Associate Professor E.E. Lutovina¹
PhD, Associate Professor I.V. Chikeneva^1
1Orenburg State Pedagogical University, Orenburg

Objective of the study was to identify the future physical education teachers’ visions of occupational safety.
Methods and structure of the study. The methods applied during the study were as follows: free association, picture arrangement test, sentence fragment test, self-analysis of the levels of personal safety and future occupational safety, written questionnaire, diagnostic interviews, analysis, synthesis, and generalization of empirical material.
Results and conclusions. The future physical education teachers were found to associate (in the conceptual aspect) their occupational safety with the implementation of the socially significant values of the safe lifestyle culture (life, health, security, knowledge, labor activity), professional functions, professional competence, success in adapting to the profession. However, in the organizational aspect, their subjective position on ensuring occupational safety was not identified. In axiological terms, future physical education teachers are lost on the value of knowledge and labor activity for occupational safety, which is reflected in their lifestyle that is largely oriented on the preservation of life and health, achievement of the state of security as an area of professional responsibility of others. In the vocational training of future physical education teachers, it is required to solve the problem of integration of the occupational safety issues with the vocational training, educational work of the university, research activities of students, pedagogical practice.

Keywords: safety, physical education, future teacher, safe lifestyle culture, professional activities.

References

1. Akimova L.A. Kultura bezopasnogo obraza zhizni budushchego uchitelya: teoriya i praktika stanovleniya [Safe lifestyle culture of future teacher: theory and practice of formation]. Moscow: Pero publ., 2020. 311 p.
2. Rossiyskaya Federatsiya. Prikazy. Ob utverzhdenii professionalnogo standarta «Pedagog (pedagogicheskaya deyatelnost v sfere doshkolnogo, nachalnogo obshchego, osnovnogo obshchego, srednego obshchego obrazovaniya) (vospitatel, uchitel)»: Prikaz Ministerstva truda i sotsialnoy zashchity # 544 n [Russian Federation. Orders. On the approval of the professional standard "Teacher (pedagogical activity in preschool, primary general, basic general, secondary general education) (educator, teacher)": Order of the Ministry of Labor and Social Protection No. 544 n]. Adopted on October 18, 2013: approved by the Minister of Labor and social protection October 18, 2013. Available at: http://www.rosmintrud.ru/docs/mintrud/orders/129.
3. FGOS. Federalnye gosudarstvennye obrazovatelnye standarty [FSES. Federal state educational standards]. Available at: https://fgos.ru.
4. Akimova L.A., Chikeneva I.V. Safe educational environment as an object of pedagogical design. Humanities Social Science Reviews. 2019.Vol. 7 (1). pp. 1-10. Available at: http://giapjournals.com/index.php/hssr/article/view/hssr.2019.7558.
5. Akimova L.A., Lutovina E.E., Chikeneva I.V. Physical education and health service safety standards in education system. Theory and Practice of Physical Culture. 2019. No. 4. pp. 65-67.