PhD, Associate Professor E.G. Zuykova¹
PhD, Associate Professor T.V. Bushma¹
PhD, Associate Professor O.N. Ustinova¹
PhD, Associate Professor A.V. Mukhina^1
1Peter the Great Saint Petersburg Polytechnic University, St. Petersburg

Objective of the study was to develop and test benefits of a new modular training course of academic elective aerobics
Methods and structure of the study. The new modular training academic aerobics course offers a system of training modules and their elements with the relevant hierarchical missions and goals geared to form the target theoretical competences and practical skills in the discipline. We sampled for the study the Peter the Great Saint Petersburg Polytechnic University’s students (n= 276) trained at elective aerobics course to test benefits of the new modular training model.
Results and conclusion. The hierarchical module structure of the modular training course is geared to facilitate the training progress with fast adaptation to aerobics trainings based on focused learning with expansion of the theoretical knowledge and practical skill sets, and with a special emphasis on the individual independence, creativity, teamwork, constructive climate in the team for successful cooperation and progress of every trainee. The progress test module is designed to profile the individual progress paths at every educational service stage using a progress test and scoring system. We used in our study a set of the personal progress rating criteria of our own design, with the progress rated using a set of special scoring tables. The new modular training aerobics course with the relevant informational service and progress facilitating provisions designed to complement the standard elective academic aerobics curricula was tested beneficial as verified by the sample progress in the physical fitness and functionality rating tests and practical accomplishments in the discipline.

Keywords: aerobics, modular training course, training module.

References

1. Vengerova N.N., Lyuik L.V., Piskun O.E. Realizatsiya FGOS «3 » po fizicheskoy kulture v vyisshey shkole [University implementation of "3+" FSES for physical education]. Teoriya i praktika fiz. kultury, 2016, no.  6, pp. 12–14.
2. Dementev K.N., Zuykova E.G., Bushma T.V. et al. Ispolzovanie tekhnologii kontsentrirovannogo obucheniya na zanyatiyakh aerobikoy [Use of concentrated training technology during aerobic practices]. Teoriya i praktika fiz. kultury. 2020. No. 2. pp. 24-26.
3. Zabrodina D.V. Dinamika rezultativnosti uchebnoy deyatelnosti v usloviyakh kontsentrirovannogo obucheniya [Dynamics of progress in education in context of concentrated learning]. Professionalnoe obrazovanie v Rossii i za rubezhom. 2013. No. 3 (11). pp. 54-58.
4. Kamenskikh D.V. Kontsentrirovannoe obuchenie kak odna iz form obrazovatelnykh tekhnologiy, sposobstvuyushchikh povysheniyu kachestva obrazovaniya [Concentrated learning as one of forms of educational technologies to improve quality of education]. Professionalnoe obrazovanie v Rossii i za rubezhom. 2014. No. 2 (14). pp.  113-119.
5. Korelskaya I.E., Varentsova I.A. Lichnostno orientirovannoe obuchenie v fizicheskom vospitanii studentov [Individualized education in academic physical education]. Teoriya i praktika fiz. kultury. 2019. No. 4. P. 27.
6. Chedova T.I., Gavronina G.A. Innovatsionnye pedagogicheskie tekhnologii kak sredstvo formirovaniya zdorovogo obraza zhizni studentov [Innovative educational technologies for healthy lifestyle promotion in student communities]. Teoriya i praktika fiz. kultury. 2019. No. 6. pp.  58-59.
7. Zuykova E.G., Bushma T.V., Lipovka A.Yu., Cherkasova A.V. The Usage Of Modular-Rating Technology In The Educational Process Of Physical Culture. The European Proceedings of Social &Behavioural Sciences EpSBS. Published by the Future Academy. 2018. Volume LI pp.127-133.
8. Shil'ko V.G., Guseva N.L., Shil'ko T.A. (2012). University physical education based on integrated technological model of sports activity. Teoriya i Praktika Fizicheskoy Kultury, (11), 59-62.