Dr.Hab., Professor V.I. Grigoryev¹
PhD, Associate Professor A.A. Mokha²
Postgraduate student V.O. Piskun^2
1St. Petersburg State University of Economics, St. Petersburg
²Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, St. Petersburg

Objective of the study was to experimentally substantiate effectiveness of the elective physical education course, built on the basis of a holistic approach.
Methods and structure of the study. Based on the scientometric indices obtained at the first stage of the study, we developed a holistic project "Sport for All". It aims to diversify the means and forms of training, provide its informatization and access to technological resources. At the second stage, 620 first-year students were tested for physical development and fitness: basic (n=490), preparatory (n=82), special (n=42) training departments, students with health limitations (n=6), boys and girls aged 18.1±0.4 years. Within the framework of the project, the students were offered swimming, sport game, athletics and fitness programs. The students of the special training department and those with health limitations were involved in Nordic and dosed walking. The classes were held according to the academic schedule: 2 times a week for 90 minutes.
Results and discussion. Three segments are identified in the structure and operational contents of the holistic project "Sport for All": program, resource and operational ones, focused on the transformation of the goal setting, planning, organization, and control functions. The project implementation changes the objective modality of the discipline, increases the quality of physical education services, and ensures the singularity of the training process, peak trends in the athletes’ physical development.

Keywords: roadmap, inclusion, innovation, competitiveness, creativity, paradigm, holistic project.

References

1. Bakulev S.E., Tajmazov V.A., Ashkinazi S.M. et al. O prioritetnykh napravleniyakh razvitiya fizicheskoy kultury i sporta v Rossiyskoy Federatsii na period do 2030 goda v kontekste razrabotki dokumentov strategicheskogo planirovaniya [On priority areas for development of physical education and sports in the Russian Federation for the period until 2030 in context of development of strategic planning documents]. Chelovek v mire fizicheskoy kultury i sporta: problemy i perspektivy razvitiya universitetskogo obrazovaniya v oblasti fizicheskoy kultury i sporta [Man in the world of physical education and sports: problems and prospects for development of university education in physical education and sport sector]. St. Petersburg: POLITECH-PRESS, 2019. pp. 53-69.
2. Vengerova N.N., Lyuik L.V., Piskun O.E. Realizatsiya FGOS «3 » po fizicheskoy kulture v vysshey shkole [University implementation of «3+» FSES for physical education]. Teoriya i praktika fiz. kultury, 2016, no. 6, pp. 12–14.
3. Grigoryev V.I., Mironova O.V. Antropotsentrizm proektnogo upravleniya elektivnoy fizicheskoy kulturoy [Anthropocentrism of project management of elective physical education]. Uchenye zapiski universiteta im. P.F. Lesgafta. 2019. no. 9 (160). pp. 54-58.
4. Manzheley I.V., Staver O.S. Pedagogicheskiy potentsial fizkulturno-sportivnoy sredy vuza [Pedagogical potential of physical culture and sports environment in universirty]. Fizicheskaya kultura: vospitanie, obrazovanie, trenirovka. 2011, no. 6, pp. 58-61.
5. Makhov A.S. Teoriya i praktika upravleniya razvitiem adaptivnogo sporta v Rossii [Theory and practice of management of development of adaptive sports in Russia]. Shuya: Shuya branch of Ivanovo State University publ., 2013, 185 p.
6. Grigoriev V.I., Piskun O.E., Pogodin S.N. Usloviya realizatsii kompetentnostnogo podkhoda v postroenii uchebnogo protsessa po fizicheskoy kulture v vuze [Competency building approach implementation conditions in design of university physical education process]. Teoriya i praktika fizicheskoy kultury, 2016, no. 7, pp.  12-14.