R.R. Magomedov, professor, Dr.Hab.
Stavropol state pedagogical institute, Stavropol
T.D. Aliev
Azov Black sea state agroengineering academy, Zernograd

Key words: formation, development, physical culture, monotechnology, criticality, self-discipline, cognitive and learning activity.
The new strategy of development of higher professional education has formed the contradiction between modern goals of education and traditional technologies of realization of the teaching process. So integration has become the methodological basis of modernization of the Russian education.
The purpose of the study was to provide the technological justification of efficiency of the educational environment of physical culture of agroengineering university students.
The integrative approach serves the methodological basis of the designed innovation technology of organization of classes in the system of vocational training. The testing of the author’s technology of organization of classes provoked a number of qualitative changes. 62,8% of students had formed their firm motivation for perfection in physical culture. Only 8,6% of students (mainly from special medical group) could not estimate their attitude to physical culture, recognize physical exercises as an important method of recreation and increase of the physical health level. 71,2% had the high level of knowledge formed in the field of physical culture; while 89,5% – readiness for development in the sphere of physical culture, and only 10,5% of students refuse learning the new aspects of their physical health and promoting it, proving the high quality of the university classes on the discipline “Physical education” based on the author’s teaching technology.

References

1. Andreev, V.I. The problem of educational monitoring of the quality of education / V.I. Andreev // Izvestiya Rossiyskoy akademii obrazovaniya. – 2001. – № 1 – P. 35-42. (In Russian)
2. Andryuschenko, L.B. Innovation technologies of organization of classes in the vocational training system: monograph / L.B. Andryuschenko, O.I. Kolomok. – Volgograd: Niva, 2006. – 224 P. (In Russian)
3. Belov, V. The system of estimation of the quality of education / V. Belov // Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii. – 2002. – № 1. – P. 44-49. (In Russian)
4. Bukalova, G.V. Modular education technology as a method of efficiency of teaching general engineering disciplines: abstract of Ph.D. thesis / G.V. Bukalova. – Bryansk, 2000. – 22 P. (In Russian)
5. Vilensky, M.Ya. Goal-setting in classes of physical education of students and approach to implementation of its content / M.Ya. Vilensky // Youth physical culture in the ХХI century: Proceedings of the 1st theor.-pract. conf. of universities of Russia’s CBSR. – Voronezh: VSU, 2001. – P. 19-23. (In Russian)
6. Dvorkin, L.S. Physical education of students: study guide / L.S. Dvorkin, K.D. Chermit, o.Yu. Davydov. – Rostov/Don: Fenix, 2008. – 700 P. (In Russian)
7. Deliya, V.P. Innovation humanitarian university education: theoretical and methodological grounds. – Moscow: PTC Altex. – 2007. – 508 P. (In Russian)
8. Kapustin, Yu.I. Rating quality control of the modern university expert training / O.I. Kapustin. – Moscow: MRUCT, 2005. – 137 P. (In Russian)
9. Magomedov, R.R., Bguashev, A.B. Formation of anthropological knowledge in the field of physical culture in students, would-be teachers: study guide. – 2nd ed., rev. / R.R. Magomedov, A.B. Bguashev.  – Stavropol: Publ. h-se of SSPI, 2011. – 300 P. (In Russian)
10. Orlan, I.V. Technology of physical education of students of the basic university department based on the sports-centered problem-modular education technology (case study of agricultural university): abstract of Ph.D. thesis. – Volgograd, 2002. – 24 P. (In Russian)