PhD, Associate Professor D.Yu. Narkhov¹
K.G. Zhiltsova¹
PhD, Associate Professor E.N. Narkhova^1
1Ural Federal University named after the First President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin, Yekaterinburg

Objective of the study was to identification of factors of reproduction of institutional and regulatory mechanisms of scientific activity as conditions for the preservation and development of youth science in the field of physical education and sports (PES).
Methods and structure of the study. A theoretical analysis of the literature on scientific activity in the higher education system was conducted, supplemented by data on the activity of young people in defending dissertations in the field of PES and materials from expert interviews in the Ural Federal District. The experts selected were scientific and pedagogical workers and managers of universities in the field of PES with experience in teaching and joint research with students.
Results and conclusions. In the context of controllability, the process of realizing the potential of youth science is based on constructive forms of interaction between university educational communities. The function of their systemic integration can be realized on the basis of value-rational interaction of internalized social attitudes of the traditions of Russian education in tactical terms. In the strategic aspect, it is necessary to revise institutional forms of management and administration, which allows overcoming or at least weakening inter-community disunity. In university science in the sphere of physical education and sports, it seems necessary to create an «ecological niche» for the sustainable development of the scientific university system, to create conditions for its high-quality reproduction based on the coordination of interests of all communities.

Keywords: youth science, physical education and sports, university educational communities, interaction, social ecosystem.

References

1. Anisimov, R. I. (2020). Budushcheye intelligentsii v sotsialnoy strukture obshchestva Postmoderna [The future of the intelligentsia in the social structure of postmodern society]. In Zh. T. Toshchenko (Ed.), Intelligentsiya: mnogoobraziye obrazov i stiley zhizni [Intelligentsia: diversity of images and lifestyles] (pp. 100–105). Moscow: RGGU.
2. Bolshakov, V. N., & Kryazhimskiy, F. V. (2003). Problema vospriyatiya obshchestvom osnovnykh ponyatiy ekologicheskoy nauki [The problem of society's perception of the basic concepts of environmental science]. In Sovremennoye informatsionno-metodologicheskoye obespecheniye nauchnosti [Modern information and methodological support of scientificity] (pp. 361–365). Yekaterinburg: UrO RAN.
3. Gorshkov, M. K., Komissarov, S. N., & Karpukhin, O. I. (2022). Na perelome vekov: sotsiodinamika rossiyskoy kultury [At the turn of the century: sociodynamics of Russian culture]. Moscow: FNISTS RAN.
4. Gorshkov, M. K., Sheregi, F. E., & Tyurina, I. O. (2023). Vosproizvodstvo spetsialistov intellektualnogo truda: sotsiologicheskiy analiz [Reproduction of intellectual labor specialists: sociological analysis]. Moscow: FNISTS RAN.
5. Dezhina, I. G. (2023). Nauchnaya politika v Rossii v 2018–2022 gg.: protivorechivyye signaly [Science policy in Russia in 2018–2022: Conflicting signals]. Sotsiologicheskiy zhurnal, 29(2), 132–149. https://doi.org/10.19181/socjour.2023.29.2.10
6. Zborovskiy, G. E., & Ambarova, P. A. (2024). Nauchno-pedagogicheskiye rabotniki v sovremennoy Rossii: teoriya i biografiya sotsialnoy obshchnosti [Scientific and pedagogical workers in modern Russia: Theory and biography of a social community]. Yekaterinburg: Gumanitarnyy universitet.
7. Lubysheva, L. I. (2022). Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya kak faktor upravleniya sotsialnymi protsessami v sfere fizicheskoy kultury i sporta [Sociological research as a factor in managing social processes in the field of physical culture and sports]. Teoriya i praktika fizicheskoy kultury, 11, 103.
8. Malkin, V. R., Rogaleva, L. N., Kim, A. M., Valeev, R. R., & Bredikhina, Ya. A. (2018). Problematika nauchnykh napravleniy sportivnoy psikhologii v Uralskom federalnom universitete [Sport psychology research and development projects at Ural Federal University]. Teoriya i praktika fizicheskoy kultury, 1, 6–8.
9. Novozhenov, Yu. I. (2005). Adaptivnost krasoty. Sotsiobiologicheskiy analiz prekrasnogo [Adaptability of beauty: Sociobiological analysis of the beautiful]. Yekaterinburg: BKI.
10. Peshkova, N. V., & Lubysheva, L. I. (2022). Polisubyektnoye upravleniye v studencheskom sporte [Polysubject management in student sports]. Moscow: NITS TPFKS.
11. Sotnikova, S. I. (2018). Novyy kontur otsenki konkurentosposobnosti nauchno-pedagogicheskikh rabotnikov: nezavisimaya otsenka kvalifikatsii [New contour of assessment of competitiveness of scientific and pedagogical workers: Independent assessment of qualifications]. Universitetskoye upravleniye: praktika i analiz, 22(3), 113–124.
12. Tikhonova, N. E., Latov, Yu. V., Latova, N. V., et al. (2023). Chelovecheskiy kapital rossiyskikh professionalov: sostoyaniye, dinamika, faktory [Human capital of Russian professionals: State, dynamics, factors]. (N. E. Tikhonova & Yu. V. Latov, Eds.). Moscow: FNISTS RAN.