Dr. Sc.Phil. R.G. Ardashev¹
Law Dr., Professor T.T. Shamurzaev^2
1East Siberian Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation, Irkutsk
²Kyrgyz Russian Slavic University named after First President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin, Bishkek

Keywords: sports competitions, extremism, security, fans.

Introduction. On an everyday level, sports extremism can lead to a violation of public order, which can lead to both personal injury and group harassment [1]. At the same time, it is necessary to take into account the social consequences after mass violence after sports competitions. This is the basis for the creation of a system for the prevention of extremism in sports competitions.
The purpose of the study is to evaluate existing strategies for preventing extremism in sports competitions.
Methodology and organization of the research. 650 people took part in the study, including 550 athletes participating in competitions of different levels, 50 coaches and 50 organizers of sports competitions. Of these, 60% are women and 40% are men. We found respondents through sports federations, so we were able to attract representatives of various sports areas. The research method was a questionnaire survey. The data was processed using the SPSS package.
The results of the study and their discussion. The following types of prevention of extremism during and after sports competitions are highlighted from the answers provided.
The first one is educational (38%). It relies on the organization of public events with the widest possible coverage (involving the media, bloggers, etc.) aimed at revealing historical, socio-cultural characteristics, actual extremist events after certain sporting events around the world to inform the public about the negative consequences of extremism.
The second one is repressive (36%). Informing the population, and subsequently strict observance of punishment for calling for extremist actions, and even more so their implementation during or after sports competitions. This type includes improving legal literacy and culture.
The third is humanistic (26%). It is based on respect for the right of every person to be who they are, to express their positions and beliefs, to show solidarity and to show involvement with one or another athlete or team of athletes and this has nothing to do with their cultural, religious, national, ethnic, political, ideological and any other views on life. It presupposes the preservation of psychological independence and culture, as well as social tolerance and respect.
Conclusions. The main tasks of the organizers, participants, fans and all other participants of sports competitions are to preserve the sporting spirit of the competition, and not to splash out negative emotions on someone else. This is a psychological and legal culture that must be nurtured through daily activities by personal example to each person, cultivating personal responsibility for everything that happens during and after sports competitions.

Literature

1. Polyushkevich O.A. Norms of solidarity after mass violence. The problem of the correlation of natural and social in society and man. 2019. No. 10. pp. 159-164.