Dr. Hab. A.A. Peredelskiy¹
Dr. Sc.Phil. A.I. Panyukov²
Dr. Psych. Yu.G. Panyukova²
Dr. Sc.Phil. V.V. Kortunov^2
1Russian State Social University, Moscow
²Russian Timiryazev State Agrarian University, Moscow

Objective of the study was to based on a theoretical analysis of the formation and modern functioning of the sphere of physical culture and sports, substantiate the possibility and necessity of constructing a scientific and philosophical theory capable of serving as a reliable ideological and methodological basis for specialized science and ideology.
Methods and structure of the study. The logic of the study consisted of compiling three analytical reports: scientific (historical and cultural), philosophical (ontological) and philosophical (epistemological and axiological).
Results and conclusions. Sports and Olympism should not be discussed abstractly and unambiguously, as a general cultural and socially homogeneous democratic movement. In different eras, sports and Olympism, manifesting themselves as social institutions of civilization, have fulfilled and continue to fulfill fundamentally different social and class orders, but first of all – orders coming from the highest state and political authority; variable fluctuations of the agonal-sports tradition within the sphere of physical culture and sports depend entirely on the changes occurring in the main spheres of the functioning of the social system as a whole.

Keywords: scientific and philosophical theory, the field of physical culture and sports, ideological and methodological basis, specialized science and ideology.

References

1. Istoriya i filosofiya nauki, sotsiologiya i psikhologiya kak teoretiko-metodologicheskiye osnovaniya postroyeniya gipotetiko-deduktivnykh teoriy i provedeniya konkretno-sotsiologicheskikh issledovaniy v oblasti fizicheskoy kultury i sporta [History and philosophy of science, sociology and psychology as theoretical and methodological foundations for constructing hypothetical-deductive theories and conducting specific sociological research in the field of physical culture and sports]. Scientific monograph. A.A. Peredelskiy [ed.]. Orel: Kartush publ., 2022. 232 p.
2. Lenk G. Sport kak sovremennyy mif? [Sport as a modern myth?]. Religiya. Magiya. Mif. Sovremennyye filosofskiye issledovaniya. Moscow: «URSS» publ. 1997. pp. 56-179.
3. Marks K., Engels F. Ekonomichesko-filosofskiye rukopisi 1844 goda [Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844]. comp., vol.42. 2nd ed. Moscow: Izdatelstvo politicheskoy literatury publ., 1974. pp. 41-174.
4. Melnikova N.Yu., Treskin A.V. Istoriya fizicheskoy kultury i sporta [History of physical education and sports]. Textbook. I.Yu. Melnikova [ed.]. 2nd ed., corr., sup. Moscow: Sport publ., 2017. 432 p.
5. Momdzhyan K.Kh. Klyuchevyye ponyatiya i metodologicheskiye podkhody. Filosofiya [Key concepts and methodological approaches. Philosophy]. Textbook for universities. V.V. Mironov [ed.]. Moscow: Norma publ., 2008. pp. 678-708.
6. Peredelskiy A.A. Filosofiya, pedagogika i psikhogogika yedinoborstv [Philosophy, pedagogy and psychogogy of martial arts]. Study guide. Moscow: Fizicheskaya kultura publ., 2008. 240 p.
7. Stolyarov V.I. Vzaimootnosheniye sporta i politiki (sotsialno-filosofskiy i metodologicheskiy analiz) [The relationship between sports and politics (social-philosophical and methodological analysis)]. Vzaimootnosheniye sporta i politiki s pozitsii gumanizma. Issue 3. Moscow, 2005. pp. 5-123.
8. Peredelsky A.A., Mamedov A.A.O., Kortunov V.V., Kotusov D.V., Zaitsev A.A. Social transformation of olympism from the position of historical analysis. Teoriya i Praktika Fizicheskoy Kultury. 2023. No. 3. pp. 112-114.
9. Peredelsky, A.A., Mamedov, A.A.O., Kortunov, V.V., Kotusov, D.V., Donskikh, K.Yu. Time for change and the next tasks for restructuring the curricula of physical education and sports universities in Russia. Teoriya i Praktika Fizicheskoy Kultury. 2023. No. 12. pp. 108-110.