Scientific and philosophical theory of sports: real state and development prospects

ˑ: 

Dr. Sc.Phil. A.A. Mamedov1
PhD M.V. Sherstyuk1
PhD A.A. Zaitsev1
PhD E.V. Gnezdilova1
1Russian Timiryazev State Agrarian University, Moscow

Objective of the study was to based on critical analysis, substantiate the development of a philosophical theory of physical culture and sports.
Methods and structure of the study. The arguments through which the evidentiary basis for the development of a philosophical theory of physical culture and sports are based are considered. The source base consists of scientific works devoted to the conceptual foundations of the development of philosophy and sports science.
Results and conclusions. In the need to develop a scientific and philosophical theory of physical culture and sport, the authors present arguments that consist in resolving such problems as the different understanding in Russian and foreign science of the subject of the philosophy of sport itself, the interpretation of the phenomenon of sport, the historical and philosophical presentation of modern science of sport, three theoretical dimensions sports, historical and philosophical falsification, consideration of the philosophy of sport as the philosophy of Olympism and its historical and philosophical falsification, logical and linguistic inconsistency of the profile thesaurus.
The authors conclude that, as a theoretical perspective, the design of a scientific and philosophical theory of sport is possible provided that all problematic issues considered in the study are systematically resolved. The structure of the model of scientific and philosophical theory presented in the article involves the development of a number of sections of philosophical applied knowledge in the fields of history, science, religion, politics, culture, and logical-linguistic analysis.

Keywords: scientific and philosophical theory of physical culture and sports, problem analysis, prospects, conditions for creation, structural components.

References

  1. Istoriya i filosofiya nauki, sotsiologiya i psikhologiya kak teoretiko-metodologicheskiye osnovaniya postroyeniya gipotetiko-deduktivnykh teoriy i provedeniya konkretno-sotsiologicheskikh issledovaniy v oblasti fizicheskoy kultury i sporta [History and philosophy of science, sociology and psychology as theoretical and methodological foundations for constructing hypothetico-deductive theories and conducting concrete sociological research in the field of physical culture and sports]. Scientific monograph. A.A. Peredelskiy [ed.]. Orel: Kartush publ., 2022. 232 p.
  2. Lenk G. Sport kak sovremennyy mif? [Sport as a modern myth?]. Religiya. Magiya. Mif. Sovremennyye filosofskiye issledovaniya. Moscow: «URSS», publ. 1997. pp. 56-179.
  3. Matveev L.P. Obshchaya teoriya sporta i yeye prikladnyye aspekty [General theory of sports and its applied aspects]. Textbook for universities of physical culture. 5th ed., rev., sup. Moscow: Sovetskiy sport publ., 2010. 340 p.
  4. Melnikova N.Yu., Treskin A.V. Istoriya fizicheskoy kultury i sporta [History of physical culture and sports]. Textbook. I.Yu. Melnikova [ed.]. 2nd ed., corr., sup. Moscow: Sport publ., 2017. 432 p
  5. Nesterov P.V. Istoricheskiye formy olimpizma [Historical forms of Olympism]. Olimpiyskoye dvizheniye, fizicheskaya kultura i sport v sovremennom obshchestve [Olympic movement, physical culture and sport in modern society]. Proceedings national scientific-practical conference with international participation, November 12-13, 2020. Moskovskaya gosudarstvennaya akademiya fizicheskoy kultury; Yu.A. Fomin, P.V. Nesterov [ed.]. Malakhovka, 2021. pp. 3-13.
  6. Nesterov P.V. Kulturno-istoricheskoye znacheniye i smysl Konstantinopolskogo edikta Feodosiya I Velikogo (393 g. n.e.) o «zaprete» Olimpiyskikh igr [The cultural and historical significance and meaning of the Edict of Constantinople by Theodosius I the Great (393 AD) on the «ban» of the Olympic Games]. Teoriya i praktika fizicheskoy kultury. 2009. No. 2. pp. 29-37.
  7. Peredelskiy A.A. Dvulikiy Yanus. Sport kak sotsialnyy fenomen: sushchnost i ontologicheskiye osnovaniya [Two-faced Janus. Sport as a social phenomenon: essence and ontological foundations]. Monograph. Moscow: Sport publ., 2016. 312 p.
  8. Stolyarov V.I. Vzaimootnosheniye sporta i politiki (sotsialno-filosofskiy i metodologicheskiy analiz) [The relationship between sport and politics (socio-philosophical and methodological analysis)]. Vzaimootnosheniye sporta i politiki s pozitsii gumanizma. Issue 3. Moscow, 2005. pp. 5-123.
  9. Stolyarov V.I. Olimpizm kak gumanisticheskaya filosofskaya kontseptsiya [Olympism as a humanistic philosophical concept]. Gumanisticheskaya teoriya i praktika sporta. Issue. 1. Moscow: «SpArt» RGAFK, publ. pp. 195-230.
  10. Stolyarov V.I. Sotsiologiya fizicheskoy kultury i sporta [Sociology of physical culture and sport]. Textbook. Moscow: Flinta: Nauka publ., 2004. 400 p.
  11. Tokarev S.A. Religiya v istorii narodov mira [Religion in the history of the peoples of the world]. 4th ed., corr., sup. Moscow: Politizdat publ., 1986. 576 p.
  12. Coubertin Pierre de. Comment conçoit les Jeux Olympiques, par Fernand Lomazzi, «L’Auto». Jean-Marie Brohm. Le Mythe Olympique, 1946. 431 р.
  13. Fairchild David L. Review Essay (рецензия на книгу): Morgan William J., Meier Klaus V. Philosophic Inquiry in Sport. Champaign, IL.: Human Kinetics, 1988. Journal of the Philosopy of Sport. Vol. XIV. 1987. pp. 71-79.
  14. Peredelskiy A.A., Mamedov A.A.O., Kortunov V.V., Kotusov D.V., Zaitsev A.A. Social transformation of olympism from the position of historical analysis. Theory and Practice of Physical Culture. 2023. No. 3. pp. 112-114.
  15. Peredelskiy A.A., Mamedov A.A.O., Kortunov V.V., Kotusov D.V., Donskikh K.Yu. Time for change and the next tasks for restructuring the curricula of physical education and sports universities in Russia. Teoriya i praktika fizicheskoy kultury. 2023. No. 12. pp. 108-110.