PhD, Associate Professor E.M. Revenko¹
T.F. Zelova¹
PhD, Associate Professor M.Kh. Spataeva^1
1The Siberian State Automobile and Highway University (SibADI), Omsk

Objective of the study was to identify the characteristics of physical fitness and typological manifestations of the properties of the nervous system of students who have chosen different types of physical activity.
Methods and structure of the study. The scientific work, carried out from 2021 to 2022, involved 1st year students (male) of the Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education "SibADI" (107 people). At the beginning of the academic year, for classes in the discipline “Elective courses in physical education and sports,” students were given the right to independently choose types of physical activity (volleyball, basketball, football, table tennis, powerlifting). The study was conducted in groups of students who chose table tennis (54 people) and powerlifting (53 people).
Results and discussion. The experiment established differences in the manifestations of motor abilities and typological properties of the nervous system in students who chose different types of motor activity (table tennis and powerlifting) as part of physical education classes. It was revealed that students who do not have sports experience, but prefer to engage in powerlifting, differ from their peers who chose table tennis in a higher level of strength abilities, but are inferior in the manifestation of speed. Significant differences in the typological features of the properties of the nervous system have also been established.

Keywords: physical education, type of motor activity, physical fitness, typological properties of the nervous system.

References

1. Balsevich V.K., Lubysheva L.I. Sportivno-oriyentirovannoye obrazovaniye: obrazovatelnyy i sotsialnyy aspekty [Sports-oriented education: educational and social aspects]. Teoriya i praktika fizicheskoy kultury. 2003. No. 5. pp. 19-22.
2. Ilyin E.P. Differentsialnaya psikhofiziologiya [Differential psychophysiology]. St. Petersburg: Piter publ., 2001. 464 p.
3. Levushkin S.P. Fiziologicheskoye obosnovaniye fizicheskoy podgotovki shkolnikov 7-17 let s raznymi tipami teloslozheniya [Physiological justification for the physical training of schoolchildren aged 7-17 years with different body types]. Doct. diss. (Biol.). Moscow, 2005. 300 p.
4. Lubysheva L.I., Zagrevskaya A.I. Kineziologicheskiy podkhod kak metodologicheskaya osnova sportizatsii fizicheskogo vospitaniya [Kinesiological approach as a methodological basis for the sportization of physical education]. Fizicheskaya kultura: vospitaniye, obrazovaniye, trenirovka. 2017. No. 6. pp. 2-4.
5. Lubysheva L.I. Sportivnaya kultura v shkole [Sports culture at school]. Teoriya i praktika fizicheskoy kultury. 2006. 173 p.
6. Manzheley I.V. Zadachi fizicheskogo vospitaniya detey i molodezhi v kontekste tendentsiy razvitiya sovremennogo obrazovaniya [Tasks of physical education of children and youth in the context of trends in the development of modern education]. Fizicheskaya kultura: vospitaniye, obrazovaniye, trenirovka. 2013. No. 3. pp. 10-14.
7. Peshkova N.V. Osobennosti lichnostnykh kharakteristik studentov, zanimayushchikhsya razlichnymi vidami dvigatelnoy aktivnosti v ramkakh sportizatsii fizicheskogo vospitaniya [Features of personal characteristics of students engaged in various types of motor activity within the framework of sportization of physical education]. Teoriya i praktika fizicheskoy kultury. 2016. No. 11. pp. 89-91.
8. Revenko E.M. Individualnyye osobennosti vozrastnogo razvitiya dvigatelnykh i intellektualnykh sposobnostey [Individual characteristics of age-related development of motor and intellectual abilities]. Omsk: SibADI publ., 2022. 297 p.
9. Salnikov V.A., Revenko E.M., Bebinov S.E. Individualnost lichnosti v sisteme innovatsionnogo fizicheskogo vospitaniya [Individuality of the individual in the system of innovative physical education]. Obrazovaniye i nauka. 2012. No. 8. pp.153-161.