Actual issues of improving the training of fencers-epee fencers in foreign literature

ˑ: 

Postgraduate student V.A. Britsky1
Dr. Hab., Professor V.A. Aikin1
PhD, Associate Professor K.Yu. Simonova1
1Siberian state university of physical education and sports, Russian Federation, Omsk

Objective of the study was to identify and generalize the directions and structure of modern foreign research on the problem of technical and tactical training of fencers at various stages of sports improvement.
Methods and structure of the study. To achieve this goal, an analysis of foreign scientific and methodological literature was carried out.
Results and conclusions. The peculiarity of foreign scientific works devoted to the technical and tactical preparedness of fencers-epee fencers is that they are of a complex integral nature, tending to analyze techniques from the point of view of several sciences, the authors try to take into account many indicators (technical, biomechanical, medical, etc.). Most of the studies are carried out using modern technical means of fixation, various hardware complexes, laboratories, etc., most of the studies are looking for answers to the problems of technical readiness in the complex of biomechanical, medical, morphofunctional, technical indicators of athletes.

Keywords: analysis, improvement, technical and tactical training of fencers, research methods.

References

  1. Agosti V., Autuori M. Fencing Functional Training System (FFTS): A New Pedagogical-Educational Training Project. Sport Sci. 2020. Vol. 13. pp. 118-122.
  2. Barth В. Strategic und Taktik des fechtens. Fechten. Berlin: Sportwerland, 1975. pp. 46-57.
  3. Barth, B. Charakteristik und Entwicklund von Strategie und Taktik. Trainingswissenschaft. Berlin: Sportverlag. 1994. pp. 93-120.
  4. Bednarski J. Warm up right and win. American fencing. 1993. pp. 29-32.
  5. Gutierrez-Davila M. et al. Effect of dual-attention task on attack and defensive actions in fencing. European journal of sport science. 2017. Vol. 17. No. 8. pp. 1004-1012.
  6. Czajkowski Z. Understanding Fencing Unity of Theory and Practice. N.Y.: Staten Island, 2005. 408 p.
  7. Harrison A.J., Ryan W. Functional data analysis of joint coordination in the development of vertical jump performance. Sports Biomechanics. 2007.
  8. Harmenberg J. Epee 2. 0: The Birth of New Fencing Paradigm. N.Y.: SK Sword Play Books, 2007. 260 p.
  9. Evangelista N. The Inner Game of Fensing: excellence in form, technique, strategy and spirit. Chicago: Master Press, 2000. 220 p.
  10. King M.A., Yeadon M.R. Maximising somersault rotation in tumbling. Journal of Biomechanics. 2004. Apr. 37 (4). pp. 471-477.
  11. Kogler A. Planning to win: designing, recording and evaluating your fencing training program. Chicago: Counter-Parry Press, 1993. 68 p.
  12. Martin D. Merkmale einer trainingswisenschaft lichen Teorie des Techniktrainings. Daugs R. u.a. (Hrsg.): Sportmotorisches Lernen und Techniktraining. Schorndjrf, 1991. Bd. 1. pp. 53-77.
  13. Mathesius R. Ausbildungpsychischer Voreussetzungenzur Regulation sport lich er Handlung en. Trainingswissenschaft. Berlin: Sportverlag, 1994. pp. 387–400.
  14. Michaelsen A. N., Cleland C. L. Kinematic determinants of scoring success in the fencing flick: Logistic and linear multiple regression analysis. PloS one. 2019. Vol. 14. No. 9. С. e0222075.
  15. Smith J.E. Foil Fencing. The techniques and tactics of modern foil fencing. Chichester: Summers dale Publishers Ltd, 2003. 176 p.
  16. Sowerby A. Fencing: Skills, Tactics, Training (Crowood Sports Guides). The CrowoodPressLtd, 2011. 202 p.
  17. Sinclair J., Bottoms L. Gender differences in patellofemoral load during the epee fencing lunge. Research in Sports Medicine. 2015. Vol. 23. No. 1. pp. 51-58.
  18. Turner A. et al. Determinants of olympic fencing performance and implications for strength and conditioning training.The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2014. Vol. 28. No. 10. pp. 3001-3011.