Dr.Hab., Professor Sh.Z. Khubbiev¹
Dr.Hab., Professor V.L. Pashuta¹
Dr.Hab., Professor N.V. Romanenko¹
Dr.Hab., Professor A.V. Kozlov^1
1Military Institute of Physical Culture, St. Petersburg
²St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg

Sport accomplishments of the leading athletes serving in the national Armed Forces are appreciated by the nation with great pride and respect. However, not all of them by far are given good opportunities to realize their individual athletic potentials. The military athletic training system individualizing may be outlined as the complex educational system designed on the optimal versatility and goal tree concepts. Military athlete will be viewed by the sport training system as an individual, personality, trainee and equal actor. Effects of the individual personality and athletic traits on the athletic training process and its outcomes are never linear. The relevant terms including individuality, individualized training, individualization, customized training and customization may be defined as follows. Individuality is the root term for the other above derivatives; individualization means the individual training system design concept that implies the personal training being customized to the individual traits and progress agenda; customization means the customized training implementation technology; with the training process individualizing and customizing tools geared to economize the military athlete’s training process. It should be mentioned that the training process individualizing and customizing tools will be reasonably applied throughout the whole multiannual sport training system in every its element.
The above definitions and the relevant assumptions will be used to compose training groups classified by the key typological factors for success of the athletic training system, with every athlete offered an individual training trajectory/ route to ensure that the training and competitive processes are duly designed and managed by the scopes, intensities, specifics and contents to mobilize the individual potential of every athlete.

Keywords: individuality, individualized training, individualization, customized training, customization, sport training.

References

1. Ananyev B.G. Chelovek kak predmet poznaniya [Man as subject of knowledge]. Leningrad, 1969. 339 p.
2. Bekman I.N. Nelineynaya dinamika slozhnykh sistem: teoriya i praktika. Metanauka. Evolyutsiya sistem [Nonlinear dynamics of complex systems: theory and practice. Metascience. Evolution of systems]. Lecture course and textbook materials. M., 2018. 613 p.
3. Ilyin E.P. Psikhofiziologiya fizicheskogo vospitaniya [Psychophysiology of physical education]. M., 1983. 234 p.
4. Klimov E.A. Vvedenie v psikhologiyu truda [Introduction to labor psychology]. University textbook. M.: Akademiya publ., 2004. 336 p.
5. «Krugly stol» zhurnala «Teoriya i praktika fizicheskoy kultury», provedenny sovmestno s administratsiey g. Smolenska, Smolenskim gumanitarnym universitetom na temu: «Metodologiya individualizatsii v fizicheskom vospitanii i sporte» [Round table of the journal Teoriya i praktika fiz. kultury, held jointly with Smolensk and Smolensk Humanitarian University administration on the topic: “Methodology of individualization in physical education and sport”].Teoriya i praktika fiz. kultury. 2007. no. 6. pp. 73-77.
6. Nazaretyan A.P. Tsivilizatsionnye krizisy v kontekste Universalnoy istorii: sinergetika, psikhologiya i futurologiya [Civilizational crises in context of universal history: synergetics, psychology and futurology]. M.: Per'se publ., 2004. 211 p.
7. Nesterenko G., Grebennikov V., Emelyanov M [ed.], S.Tsymbal [res.ed.] et al. Pedagogika mnogoobraziya [Pedagogy of manifold]. Study guide. Herson: OLDI-PLuS publ., 2016. 420 p.