Dr. Sc. Pych., Associate Professor I.S. Krutko¹
PhD, Associate Professor N.V. Popova¹
I.I. Bauer^1
1Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin, Yekaterinburg

Objective of the study was to analyze the engineering students’ attitudes to physical education and safe behavior with their competitive spirit and stress tolerance building benefits.
Methods and structure of the study. The study of youth safe behavior and the relevant addiction control competences was run in Yekaterinburg in 2021. We sampled for the study the 1-2-year Ural Federal University bachelor sporting students of different specialties. First we run a questionnaire survey of the group safe behavior with the safe behavior analysis and classification to find the key socio-didactic problems of the safe behavior styling service (February 2021, n=146). The survey was followed by a viability rating psychological tests of a vulnerable subsample (n=60) that reported high-risk experiences they failed to effectively address.
Results and conclusion. The study tested the sporting students sample low on the viability/ stress tolerance resource scales, with the stress coping strategies dominated by confrontational coping styles. The safe behavior style in the sporting students perceptions was found centered on the personality component and operational component. Such primary safe behavior style provides a basis for an integrated proactive safe behavior style and safe-behavior-based stress tolerance building service for young people. The study has contributed to the Stress Tolerance Building Project with its Viability Laboratory that offers special mental conditioning games to help trainees master the safe behavior style formation basics by the high-risk situations and stress coping behavior modeling and testing role games.

Keywords: health protection technologies, sporting students, health, sport, stress tolerance, safe behavior.

References

1. Baskakova S.A. Sovremennye predstavleniya o sposobakh sovladaniya s psikhicheskimi rasstroystvami [Modern ideas about ways of coping with mental disorders]. Sotsialnaya i klinicheskaya psikhiatriya. 2010. no. 2, V. 20. pp. 88–97.
2. Bauer I.I., Krutko I.S., Ponomarev A.V. Preventologicheskoe obespechenie bezopasnogo povedeniya studencheskoy molodezhi [Preventive maintenance of students’ safe behavior]. Primo Aspectu. 2020. No. 2 (42). pp. 81–87.
3. Volman Y.G. Zhiznestoykost sportsmenov v kontekste izucheniya suverennosti psikhologicheskogo prostranstva i sklonnosti k deviantnomu povedeniyu [Vitality of athletes in context of studying sovereignty of psychological space and tendency to deviant behavior]. Lichnost v professionalno-obrazovatelnom prostranstve [Personality in professional educational space]. Proc. XV national research-practical conference, Yekaterinburg, November 25 2016. E.F. Zeer, D.P. Zavodchikov [ed.]. Yekaterinburg: Russian State Vocational Pedagogical University publ., 2016. pp. 16–20.
4. Volobueva N.M., Serezhko T.A. Zhiznestoykost i religioznost kak resursy sovremennogo cheloveka v trudnykh zhiznennykh situatsiyakh [Vitality and religiosity as resources of modern man in difficult life situations]. Nauchnye vedomosti Belgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser.: Gumanitarnye nauki. 2015. No. 24 (221). pp. 151–158.
5. Selivanova O.A., Gladkova L.N Sootnoshenie ponyatiy «sotsialno bezopasnoe» i «sotsialno opasnoe» povedenie nesovershennoletnikh v sovremennoy pedagogicheskoy nauke [Correlation between concepts of "socially safe" and "socially dangerous" behavior of minors in modern pedagogical science]. Vestnik Tyumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2015. Vol. 1. no 1 (1). pp. 198–205.